Ken of the Future
Author:Ken Of The Future, aka Fluxite
November 27, 2024
This first article in my blog outlines my working theory, developed through experiments, observations, and intuitive thought, regarding the nature of magnetic fields. Understanding this theory—even if you do not accept my conclusions—is critical for comprehending the articles that transform these theories into practical applications, with the goal of presenting a working free energy device. A comprehensive theory of what a magnetic field is, in the first place, is required to develop such a device; otherwise, it's just guesswork, which I do not use. This report explains how a magnetic field is formed, what it is, and its properties, culminating in a conclusive yet simple explanation of why a magnet sticks to a fridge.
Central to this explanation is the dynamic behavior of a magnetic field composed of individual "threads." These threads exhibit repulsion against each other when they are parallel and oriented in the same direction. Each thread has a tension that, when compounded, forms a magnetic field. This theory outlines the properties of these threads and establishes a mathematical framework to provide an interpretation of magnetic attraction and repulsion similar to those observed in electromagnetic, electrostatic, and electrical phenomena.
The phenomenon of a magnet sticking to a fridge is often explained in classical physics through the alignment of magnetic domains in ferromagnetic materials. While this explanation attempts to describe the general interaction, it does not delve deeply into the intrinsic properties of what a magnetic field actually is, nor does it fully explain magnetic attraction or repulsion. Therefore, current theory lacks useful insights. Magnetic fields, pervasive in nature and technology, remain a subject of ongoing exploration.
Historically, Michael Faraday’s empirical discoveries demonstrated the interplay between electricity and magnetism without making theoretical assumptions. Conversely, James Clerk Maxwell’s equations, while mathematically elegant, often lack grounding in observable phenomena and do not provide a theory of how a magnetic field forms or what it is. Looking back on scientific history, I consider modern science's acceptance of Maxwell's theories to have stunted physics knowledge on many levels. This paper presents a comprehensive understanding of magnetic fields, their interaction with compatible materials, and their roots in atomic and quantum structures, guided by known fundamental principles.
Repulsion, tension, and dynamic behavior when interacting with magnetic or magnetized surfaces have not been fully addressed. This report presents a detailed theoretical framework to tackle these properties, offering a richer understanding of how magnets interact with their environment. By incorporating hydrodynamic analogies, exploring field line dynamics, and integrating mathematical principles, this theory exposes new insights into the forces causing magnetic attraction and repulsion. Additionally, it examines the quantum mechanical aspects of magnetism, highlighting how electron spin and orbital angular momentum contribute to magnetic properties. This comprehensive approach not only elucidates the underlying mechanisms but also bridges the gap between classical and quantum descriptions of magnetic phenomena.
Let's begin with a simple analogy of a single magnetic field line—or "thread" as I will refer to it—represented by a rubber band stretched around a ball. The larger the ball, the more tension on the rubber band. This tension ensures that the rubber band follows the shortest path from one end of the ball to the other. Now, if we add a second rubber band parallel to the first, and if both rubber bands have a property that causes them to repel each other, the two rubber bands will gravitate to equal distances apart.
Let's now add hundreds of rubber bands around the ball, each repelling the others. The inner rubber bands would have less stretching tension but more pressure from the outer bands, as the outer bands' tension presses against them. The outer bands would be more stretched and have a much greater tension than the inner bands. This is analogous to the billions of threads that make up a strong permanent magnet's field. Now, I need to discuss how these threads are formed and constitute a magnetic field. This theory does not dispute the strength of magnetic attraction or repulsion at a distance, as expressed using the following principles:
For two magnetic dipoles \( \mathbf{m}_1 \) and \( \mathbf{m}_2 \), the force between them at a distance \( r \) is given by:
\[ \mathbf{F} = \frac{3 \mu_0}{4 \pi r^4} \left[ (\mathbf{m}_1 \cdot \mathbf{m}_2) - 3 (\mathbf{m}_1 \cdot \hat{r})(\mathbf{m}_2 \cdot \hat{r}) \right] \hat{r} \]
Where:
I aim to more accurately explain the properties and how this force is created and maintained at the atomic level.
A magnetic field line is composed of a sigle thread which has among other properties - space and time. Each magnetized atom projects a thread resulting from a distorted internal field. This distorted thread exits one area of the atom and, due to its direction and repulsion from other threads, must stretch out from one end of the magnet and re-enter at the other end. These threads repel one another to form a cohesive magnetic field. It's well known that two permanent magnets repel each other at like poles (North-North and South-South) and attract each other at opposite poles (North-South).
A thread exists - therefore it has a time and space component. The time component is inherant to the thread while the space component wraps around the thread as an insulator. The time factor causes the thread to have a tension - it always wants to contract back and nulify itself. This is the tension we see in a magnetic field line. Space components merge together when in a same direction while they repel each other when in different directions. Thus space being wrapped around the thread has a dominent feature which is that it repels other like kind space threads. The space component is what prevents the magnetic field from collapsing. Space is directional. The direction of space and its time component are a results from the direction of the current used to magnetize the magnet, following the right-hand rule. In a conductive wire such as copper, the thread does not remain extended after the current ceases; thus, it relaxes back within the atom. This thread is present in all compatible magnetic materials; however, when not magnetized, it forms part of the atom's internal forces—in other words, the thread is in a relaxed state within the atom.
For example, when an iron bar is magnetized, the threads that were relaxed within the atom are "bulged" out of their atomic structure. Although this analogy is not strictly scientific, it illustrates that the thread exists at all times but is forced out of alignment when magnetized. This can be visualized as the thread being locked between miss-aligned atomic orbits. They are contorted and bulging out of the atom. Each magnetized atom has one bulged thread, and as these threads are aligned in the same direction, they collectively repel each other and form a magnetic field.
The pattern of a magnetic field is that of a torus. The torus shape or donut shape is a result of the combined field lines and their features. The elements that can maintain a magnetic field may be unlimited as our current use has been limited to basic elements. As an example, crystals can be magnetized.
Current accepted theory is that the distinguishing feature of magnetic materials lies in the behavior of their unpaired electrons in the 3d orbitals. I do not subscribe to this and suspect that the electrons are fixed in place but not neccesary in time. Electrons may blink in and out of time as a pulse in what may appear as an orbital. This has not been determined yet.
When a direct current is applied to a wire wrapped around a magnetic material, the current generates a magnetic field, as demonstrated by Michael Faraday. This magnetic field induces atomic particles within the magnetic material to become "cogged" or locked into specific orbital positions. This locking effect compresses the particle, causing them to take on the shape of threads as previously discussed.
The distortion and alignment of these threads within the magnetic material result in the formation of a coherent magnetic field. As the direct current continues to flow, more threads become aligned in this manner, strengthening the overall magnetic field. This process effectively magnetizes the material, allowing it to retain a magnetic field even after the external current is removed.
In this theory, atomic particles are threads having primary features that include time and space. act as threads that extend from the atoms due to the influence of the magnetic field generated by the current. The "squeezing" of the particle alters their spatial orientation, causing them to project outward and align with neighboring threads. This collective alignment enhances the magnetic properties of the material and explains how a magnetic field is formed at the atomic level.
Understanding electrons as threads that can be manipulated through external currents provides deeper insight into the mechanisms behind magnetization and magnetic field generation. It bridges the gap between the macroscopic observations of magnetism and the microscopic behaviors of subatomic particles, offering a more comprehensive explanation of magnetic phenomena.
As outlined herein, atomic particles are threads that make up a permanent magnetic field. These threads have consistent properties: The space component causes them to repel each other when parallel, combine when aligned, and possess tension that is a result of its time feature.
When a permanent magnet is brought close to a non-magnetized material such as a fridge surface, the magnet's threads, having tension, attempt to align with the particles in the fridge. The particles in the fridge are fixed, and the threads cannot realign them; instead, the threads follow a path where the particles of the fridge surface are already aligned. This causes the outer threads to stretch and increase their tension, which pulls the permanent magnet toward the fridge. This, in turn, causes the inner threads to expand and equalize while also attempting to align with the fridge particles. Hence, the closer a magnet is brought to a fridge surface, the stronger its attraction becomes.
Outer Field Lines: These lines are stretched as they "seek" a magnetic or conductive pathway to complete their circuit.
Increased Tension: Stretching creates a strong pull toward the surface.
Inner Field Lines: Expand slightly to balance the field configuration.
The magnet's field lines align with the fridge's magnetic or conductive surface, stretching into a zigzag pattern as they interact with misaligned domains. This process amplifies the pull of the magnet toward the fridge as field line tension increases.
This theory suggests that magnetic attraction and repulsion share underlying principles with electrostatic attraction and repulsion, governed by the common behavior of electron thread properties—whether magnetic, electric, or electrostatic. By understanding these threads, we can explore the relationship between these forces and their potential unification. This theory provides a foundation for future exploration, which will be outlined in the upcoming blog articles. The goal is nothing short of a free energy device that operates 24 hours a day.
I welcome your comments on our YouTube channel.
Warm Regards,
Ken of the Future
Fluxite Blog Articles
Fridge Mag Pt. 1
